In his paper “Flaws of Formal Relationism”, Mahrad Almotahari argues against the sort of response to Frege's Puzzle I have defended elsewhere, which he dubs ‘Formal Relationism’. Almotahari argues that, because of its specifically formal character, this view is vulnerable to objections that cannot be raised against the otherwise similar Semantic Relationism due to Kit Fine. I argue in response that Formal Relationism has neither of the flaws Almotahari claims to identify.Links: PhilPapers, Thought, Pre-publication PDF.
Blog Moved
Saturday, October 18, 2014
"In Defense of Formal Relationism" Published
I am pleased to report that my paper "In Defense of Formal Relationism" has been published in the latest issue of Thought. Here's the abstract:
Labels:
philosophy
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcome, but they are expected to be civil.
Please don't bother spamming me. I'm only going to delete it.